Interested in racing? We have collected a lot of interesting things about Oallaghan V Coral Racing Limited. Follow the links and you will find all the information you need about Oallaghan V Coral Racing Limited.


O'Callaghan v Coral Racing Ltd: CA 19 Nov 1998 - swarb.co.uk

    https://swarb.co.uk/ocallaghan-v-coral-racing-ltd-ca-19-nov-1998/
    O’Callaghan v Coral Racing Ltd: CA 19 Nov 1998. An agreement for the referral of disputes to arbitration made as part of a gaming agreement is as unenforceable as the void agreement of which it is part and parcel. Lord Justice Hirst Lord Justice May And Sir Christopher Slade. Times 26-Nov-1998, [1998] EWCA Civ 1801.

The Principle of Separability - LawTeacher.net

    https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/common-law/the-principle-of-separability-law-essays.php
    O’Callaghan v Coral Racing The summary issues in this case were discussed below: “Lord Justice Hirst gave the case is about wagering contract between the appellant and Coral was affirmed null and void by section 18 of the Gaming Act 1845. It was evident therefore that the arbitrator would be gratified to hold that the transaction was null and void.

Thursday Law Report: Gaming dispute decision was not …

    https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/thursday-law-report-gaming-dispute-decision-was-not-arbitration-1187345.html
    The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal of Terence Matthew O'Callaghan against the refusal of his applications for an order for remission, pursuant to section 22 (1) of the Arbitration Act 1950,...

ICC Digital Library

    https://library.iccwbo.org/content/dr/ARTICLES/ART_DOSS_0020_CH10.htm
    In order to avoid the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, the party must show that illegality goes to the root of the arbitration agreement. In O'Callaghan v Coral Racing Ltd, 48 the Court held that the arbitration agreement could not be separated from the main contract because the main contract was null and void pursuant to the Gaming Act 1845. As the transaction was "not in law a …

CORAL RACING LIMITED overview - Find and update company

    https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/00541600
    Charges for CORAL RACING LIMITED (00541600) More for CORAL RACING LIMITED (00541600) Registered office address 3rd Floor One New Change, London, United Kingdom, EC4M 9AF . Company status Active Company type Private limited Company Incorporated on 7 December 1954. Accounts. Next ...

Monie v Coral Racing Ltd: CA 1980 - swarb.co.uk

    https://swarb.co.uk/monie-v-coral-racing-ltd-ca-1980/
    Impey v Secretary of State for the Environment: QBD 2 Jan 1983; Takkar v Regina: CACD 18 Mar 2011; Wisniewski v Poland: ECHR 8 Mar 2011; Weiss v Regina: 15 Dec 2005; Opinion: 1581; Watts v Rubery Owen Conveyancer Limited: EAT 1977; Naqvi v Stephens Jewellers Ltd: EAT 1978; Spiro v Glencrown Properties Ltd and Another: ChD 1991; Regina v Bolton ...

ALBERT IAN KINLOCH (AP) AGAINST CORAL RACING …

    https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=c72b2da7-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7
    The First‑tier Tribunal sat in private to hear the case between 25 October and 5 November 2010, 18 to 21 and 26 to 28 April, 3 to 6 May and 7 to 10 and 16 November 2011, and 16 to 18 January 2012. A judgment against HMRC was issued on 29 October 2012 and HMRC appealed to the Upper Tribunal.

English High Court addresses separability of arbitration …

    https://www.dlapiper.com/en/us/insights/publications/2013/06/english-high-court-addresses-separability-of-arb__/
    The English High Court in Beijing Jianlong Heavy Industry Group v Golden Ocean Group Limited & Ors 1 recently addressed the issue of the separability of arbitration agreements and the circumstances in which public policy factors invalidating the underlying contract may also impeach an arbitration clause.. In its pro-arbitration conclusion, the court reinforced the …

Sweetin v. Coral Racing | [2006] IRLR 252 | United Kingdom …

    https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5a8ff79c60d03e7f57eb0233
    If there were not, then the conclusion had to be that the maximum possible sum, namely the equivalent of thirteen weeks' pay ought to be awarded. Reference was made, in support of that submission to the cases of Susie Radin Ltd v GMB & Ors [2004] EWCA Civ 180 and Smith & anr v Cherry Lewis Ltd (in receivership) [2005] IRLR 86. Respondents' Case ...

Monie v Coral Racing Ltd 1980 | Emplaw

    https://www.emplaw.co.uk/lawguide/97c8.htm
    Monie v Coral Racing Ltd 1980. Monie v Coral Racing Ltd [1981] ICR. 109, Court of Appeal on 31st October 1980 (also reported at [1980] IRLR 464)

Got enough information about Oallaghan V Coral Racing Limited?

We hope that the information collected by our experts has provided answers to all your questions. Now let's race!